[Nut-upsdev] Powercom support and sponsorship

Morozov Alexey morozov at pcm.ru
Tue Nov 10 07:55:22 UTC 2009


Dear All,
Kindly please work out in detail your questions.

Sincerely yours
--
Alexey Morozov
distribution manager 


-----Original Message-----
From: Arjen de Korte [mailto:nut+devel at de-korte.org] 
Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2009 12:33 AM
To: Alexander Gordeev
Cc: nut-upsdev at lists.alioth.debian.org; Morozov Alexey
Subject: Re: [Nut-upsdev] Powercom support and sponsorship

Citeren Alexander Gordeev <lasaine at lvk.cs.msu.su>:

>> Could you do the same, but now at debug level 3 (-DDD). I would like 
>> to see the raw dump of the report descriptor too, to see where the 
>> error is. My guess is that there is something wrong with the contents

>> of the report descriptor, that might allocate too little room for the

>> reports.
>
> Sure, attached it.

Bad news, the report descriptor is badly broken for the reports I
mentioned (and a couple of others too). This needs to be fixed by
Powercom, we can't do anything about that. Note that it is extremely
unlikely that the Logical Minimum and Logical Maximum values for the
battery voltage are 100 and 230 respectively.

It looks like the person who wrote this, did copy-and-paste a couple of
reports and forgot to change them to the final values. The fact that

    UPS.PowerSummary.Voltage
    UPS.Battery.Voltage
    UPS.Input.Voltage
    UPS.Output.Voltage

all report a value of '212' is a tell tale sign for this. Could it be
that you have a prototype model? And that the final firmware is still
being developed? If not, Powercom seems to have a serious problem.

Best regards, Arjen
--
Please keep list traffic on the list




More information about the Nut-upsdev mailing list