[Nut-upsdev] [nut-commits] svn commit r1965 - branches/AsciiDoc/docs/man
clepple at gmail.com
Tue Sep 8 13:12:14 UTC 2009
On Sep 8, 2009, at 8:49 AM, Charles Lepple wrote:
> On Sep 8, 2009, at 8:30 AM, Charles Lepple wrote:
>> +EXTRA_DIST = tripplite_usb.8.txt \
>> + ups.conf.5.txt \
>> + upsc.8.txt
> The EXTRA_DIST thing is a hack. Right now, we are not including the
> generated HTML properly, because I haven't figured out the automake
> way to do this correctly.
> Specifically, we want to treat the .txt files as source, and
> distribute the generated HTML. The automake documentation is heavily
> biased towards the normal C-to-executable compilation path.
I should also mention that the "Battle for Wesnoth" project does not
seem to use automake the same way we do, so that won't help us much.
They use it as a template for Makefile rules, but the targets of the
rules are not listed explicitly.
Put another way, I don't think you would get a proper tarball if you
ran 'make dist' in the root.
(They also have rule files for SCons and CMake alongside Makefile.am.)
I also looked at the Git source tree (since they use AsciiDoc as
well), but they only use plain Makefiles.
More information about the Nut-upsdev