[Nut-upsdev] apcsmart question

[Arnaud Quette]

2011/4/19 Arnaud Quette <aquette.dev at gmail.com>

>
>
> 2011/4/15 Michal Soltys <soltys at ziu.info>
>
>> W dniu 14.04.2011 23:49, Arnaud Quette pisze:
>>
>>
>>> I would more be in favor of finally using the extra param of
>>> instcmd(const char *cmdname, const char *extra)
>>> and mapping these commands onto existing ones. Specific parameters would
>>> then be described in manpages.
>>>
>>>
>> I'm all for this approach. Should just work, from what I've seen, without
>> any need for custom command trickery.
>
>
> indeed.
>

wrong. I've checked, and the pipe is broken in server/netinstcmd.c (patch
underway).

cheers,
Arno
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/nut-upsdev/attachments/20110423/29c16f2f/attachment.htm>