[Nut-upsdev] apcsmart question
aquette.dev at gmail.com
Fri Apr 22 22:48:34 UTC 2011
2011/4/19 Arnaud Quette <aquette.dev at gmail.com>
> 2011/4/15 Michal Soltys <soltys at ziu.info>
>> W dniu 14.04.2011 23:49, Arnaud Quette pisze:
>>> I would more be in favor of finally using the extra param of
>>> instcmd(const char *cmdname, const char *extra)
>>> and mapping these commands onto existing ones. Specific parameters would
>>> then be described in manpages.
>> I'm all for this approach. Should just work, from what I've seen, without
>> any need for custom command trickery.
wrong. I've checked, and the pipe is broken in server/netinstcmd.c (patch
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Nut-upsdev