[Nut-upsdev] [nut-commits] buildbot failure in Network UPS Tools on Fedora-x64

[Arnaud Quette]

2011/11/25 Charles Lepple <clepple at gmail.com>:
>
> On Nov 25, 2011, at 4:36 AM, Arnaud Quette <aquette.dev at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hey Charles,
>>
>> 2011/11/24  <clepple+buildbot at ghz.cc>:
>>> The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder Fedora-x64 while building Network UPS Tools.
>>> Full details are available at:
>>>  http://buildbot.networkupstools.org/public/nut/builders/Fedora-x64/builds/453
>>>
>>> Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.networkupstools.org/public/nut/
>>>
>>> Buildslave for this Build: pune-fc10-64bit
>>>
>>> Build Reason: The web-page 'force build' button was pressed by 'clepple':
>>>
>>> Build Source Stamp: [branch branches/Eaton_SDK] Testing
>>> Blamelist:
>>>
>>> BUILD FAILED: failed svn
>>
>> thanks for pushing the build on this branch.
>>
>> wouldn't it be better to tie the testing of branch to "--revision
>> HEAD", to be more generic?
>> It still seem to be linked to 'Testing', which is not applicable
>> anymore for long.
>>
>
> I meant to leave the revision field blank. Next forced build was what I intended to do.

so it build x86_64.
BTW, I've noticed a compilation warning (implicit declaration of
function ‘nut_ipmi_get_sensors_status’) that I've fixed in r3335...

FYI, Fred has developed and tested this Eaton SDK on:
- linux x86 and x86_64,
- Windows x86

which is, at least, the current scope.

Any comment from your side on a possible integration in the trunk?
I'm too biased to consider my voice relevant here...

cheers,
Arnaud
-- 
Linux / Unix Expert R&D - Eaton - http://powerquality.eaton.com
Network UPS Tools (NUT) Project Leader - http://www.networkupstools.org/
Debian Developer - http://www.debian.org
Free Software Developer - http://arnaud.quette.free.fr/