[Nut-upsdev] How to cause a local system shutdown...
Charles Lepple
clepple at gmail.com
Wed Feb 15 23:42:32 UTC 2012
On Feb 15, 2012, at 4:13 PM, William R. Elliot wrote:
> Came across this note in section 4.8 of the developers guide before adding FSD to the driver:
>
> Note
>
> upsd injects "FSD" by itself following that command by a master upsmon process. Drivers must not set that value.
>
> Should I try it anyway as suggested?
It's worth a try, since your use case effectively does not have a NUT master - the "master" is another system entirely. If it works, we will want to update the documentation for that case.
> Thanks,
>
> Bill
>
> At 08:13 AM 2/15/2012, Charles Lepple wrote:
>> On Feb 14, 2012, at 11:10 PM, William R. Elliot wrote:
>>
>>> OK. Totally missed that I could send FSD as a status from the driver...sorry. I'll give that a shot.
>>
>> Bill,
>>
>> Not a problem. I think you are breaking new ground here, but it's something that we should consider for other big UPS models.
>>
>> Arnaud,
>>
>> Have you had a chance to follow this discussion? Basically, it sounds like we have a gap in the shutdown mechanism if NUT is set up to monitor an UPS, but the force-shutdown command is sent to the UPS by another system which is not the NUT master. This would probably apply to Eaton's multi-user UPSes like those monitored by snmp-ups and the XML-based cards.
>>
>> top of the thread: http://news.gmane.org/find-root.php?message_id=%3c201202092250.q19MoEhE018871%40wreassoc.com%3e
>>
>> --
>> Charles Lepple
>> clepple at gmail
>>
>>
--
Charles Lepple
clepple at gmail
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/nut-upsdev/attachments/20120215/f1aa7a2b/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the Nut-upsdev
mailing list