[Nut-upsdev] Mixed-commit problem solved

Arnaud Quette aquette.dev at gmail.com
Mon Jan 9 12:06:43 UTC 2012

Hi Charles,

2012/1/8 Charles Lepple <clepple at gmail.com>

> On Jan 6, 2012, at 7:34 PM, Eric S. Raymond wrote:
> > # 4. Is the new_UIs-root tag still useful?  It doesn't seem to point
> > #    at an actual branch.
> ESR: In terms of content, no - not useful.
> Arnaud: While nothing has been committed on this branch[*], this is a good
> reminder to check your development machines for any working copies with
> uncommitted changes.
> [*] http://trac.networkupstools.org/projects/nut/log/branches/new_UIs

The actual work has been done in the trunk, on NUT Monitor.
This branch goes back before this, and we can now delete it (which I've
done in r3380) since I don't see any added value there.

Note that I have a few things stagging for the "Powerchain" branch, which
is not yet usable, but might be worth to commit.
But since I don't want to interfere with the git transition, this can wait
a bit more...

Linux / Unix Expert R&D - Eaton - http://powerquality.eaton.com
Network UPS Tools (NUT) Project Leader - http://www.networkupstools.org/
Debian Developer - http://www.debian.org
Free Software Developer - http://arnaud.quette.free.fr/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/nut-upsdev/attachments/20120109/8a8ef5cc/attachment.html>

More information about the Nut-upsdev mailing list