[Nut-upsdev] RFC about adding new variable (ups.runtime)

[Arnaud Quette]

You may even go more generic with device.uptime

Arno
(sent from my S3... please excuse my brevity)
Le 15 avr. 2013 13:46, "Michal Soltys" <soltys at ziu.info> a écrit :

> W dniu 15.04.2013 13:31, Charles Lepple pisze:
>
>> On Apr 15, 2013, at 7:22 AM, Michal Soltys wrote:
>>
>>  Namely something like:
>>>
>>> ups.runtime - amount of seconds since powering up
>>>
>>
>>
>> I like the idea. Many UPS manufacturers specify the amount of time on
>> battery for a given load as "runtime", though, so maybe "ups.uptime"
>> (similar to the Unix uptime command)?
>>
>>
> Agree, sounds better.
>
>
> ______________________________**_________________
> Nut-upsdev mailing list
> Nut-upsdev at lists.alioth.**debian.org <Nut-upsdev at lists.alioth.debian.org>
> http://lists.alioth.debian.**org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/**nut-upsdev<http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsdev>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/nut-upsdev/attachments/20130417/ede73589/attachment.html>