[Nut-upsdev] [blazer_usb] Support for TECNOWARE ERA LCD (FGCERALCD0K85)

[Charles Lepple]

On Jan 26, 2013, at 4:08 AM, flavio wrote:

> I have uninstalled Upsilon2000, installed WinNUT (with ups connected) and do a sniff during installation :
> 
> https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B-R2BvGl0W6DNUVjQUszbkJnRjQ/edit
> https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B-R2BvGl0W6DYWllQjhSQVVrQUU/edit
> 
> tell me if it's enougth or I have to do some more specific configuration ;)

I have never installed the Windows version of NUT, but if there isn't any automated configuration file creation in the installer, I'd say you would need to create at least an ups.conf, something like the following:

######
[tecnoware]
	port = auto
	driver = blazer_usb
######

and start at least the driver. (Setting up the upsd side will allow you to see whether the stats are working as well.) 

> 2013/1/24 Rob Power <robpwr at gmail.com>
> No hints about ulz format actually.
> Hopefully Flavio may help giving a new sniff using Windows version of NUT; I would like, too, but I phisically can't.
> 
> 
> 
> 2013/1/15 Charles Lepple <clepple at gmail.com>
> On Jan 13, 2013, at 3:29 PM, Rob Power wrote:
> 
> > On the other side, string langid descriptor (line 0052) seems to be empty, is that possible?
> 
> This might just be the way that the HTML shows it. Does USBlyzer have any documentation on the .ulz file format? (The data from the USB SETUP phase appears to be stored before most of the transactions, but I am having a little trouble calculating where each packet starts without just looking for known USB data sequences.)
> 
> I'm also thinking that it might be useful to compare flavio's full UPSilon log with a USBlyzer log from the Windows version of NUT: http://www.networkupstools.org/download.html#_binary_packages
> 
> Even though it is based off of the same basic codebase as the Unix version of NUT (and probably won't connect to the UPS as it stands now), it will be easier to compare the two .ulz files line-by-line.
> 
> I haven't used the Windows NUT port myself, but if you have any questions, feel free to post them to the list.
> 
> --
> Charles Lepple
> clepple at gmail
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

-- 
Charles Lepple

A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/nut-upsdev/attachments/20130126/6f2a6c37/attachment.html>