[Nut-upsdev] NUT `ups.status` values and ECO mode

[Jim Klimov]

Hello all,

  During discussions in several recent tickets, I've (re?)discovered that
NUT codebase
is not overly consistent with use of status names (e.g. `!OL` instead of
`OB` in some cases),
and we seem to lack a consistent approach to "ECO mode" as well (whatever
vendors might mena by that, what NUT reflects it as and whether/how it
shows up in the status or can be or not be managed from SW to HW).

* https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/issues/2495
* https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/issues/2496

  Insights and inputs would be welcome, not in the least to standardize on
a status and command name approach that would best suit the mix of
different vendors' concepts.

Thanks in advance,
Jim Klimov
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/nut-upsdev/attachments/20240627/9e804b49/attachment.htm>