[Nut-upsuser] SOS : Help needed for UPS Centralion Blazer
2000VAUSB
Kjell Claesson
kjell.claesson at telia.com
Wed Apr 12 21:15:16 UTC 2006
Hi,
There is a slight difference between the bcmxcp_usb driver and this
ups.
If you look at the descriptor it tell you that the protocol is reported on
the interface level. The interface level say HID device.
If you look at the bcmxcp_usb driver it say vendor protocol on
the interface level.
So this should follow the usb hid device rules on the interface.
Regards
Kjell
----- Original Message -----
From: "Arnaud Quette" <aquette.dev at gmail.com>
To: "Carlos Rodrigues" <carlos.efr at mail.telepac.pt>
Cc: <nut-upsuser at lists.alioth.debian.org>
Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2006 7:48 PM
Subject: Re: [Nut-upsuser] SOS : Help needed for UPS Centralion Blazer 2000VAUSB
Hi Carlos,
2006/4/12, Carlos Rodrigues <carlos.efr at mail.telepac.pt>:
> That hardware doesn't have a serial port right?
>
> I think that UPS could be supported if only one could configure a
> "ttyUSB" with that serial-usb converter.
>
> I (temporarily) have a model with an USB port here, and I would like
> to see if I could get it to work with "megatec"/"powermust" without
> resorting to some HID/USB magic...
>
> The protocol used seems to be the same, so the only thing needed is to
> configure a emulated serial port. Anyone has any ideas?
isn't bcmxcp_usb built on the same idea?
iirc, they were just encaps'ing the serial protocol over usb (not sure
about hid). Another example of "strange hid approach" is energizerups,
but it's hiddev only. Anyway, all this might give you some ideas ;-)
Arnaud
_______________________________________________
Nut-upsuser mailing list
Nut-upsuser at lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsuser
More information about the Nut-upsuser
mailing list