[Nut-upsuser] bcmxcp_usb can not communicate with Eaton Powerware 5110
daehenoc at iinet.net.au
Wed Aug 1 07:43:01 UTC 2012
On 31/07/12 01:02, Arnaud Quette wrote:
> Hi Greg,
> 2012/7/29 Greg Vickers <daehenoc at iinet.net.au
> <mailto:daehenoc at iinet.net.au>>
> On 22/07/12 20:14, Greg Vickers wrote:
> Hi Arnaud,
> On 18/07/12 20:59, Arnaud Quette wrote:
> I've just made a quick test on an Opengear ACM 50004-2
> (ARM supervision appliance).
> For the record:
> - uname -a: Linux acm5004-2 188.8.131.52-uc0 #1 Tue Feb 15
> 09:30:54 EST 2011 armv4tl unknown
> - nut version: 2.4.3 (so bcmxcp_usb 0.23)
> - tried with a PW5110 (ups.firmware: Cont:00.50 Inve:01.50)
> and everything worked like a charm.
> That said, Charles and Kjell comments are fully valid.
> That is, try with the latest version (2.6.4). It has at
> least more debug traces to help getting visibility.
> I've tested with nut 2.6.4, with the same result, i.e. this
> driver can't communicate with the UPS.
> What switches should I use with the driver to provide you the
> debug information? More -D switches?
> Could you perhaps test the 5110 on your Ubuntu system,
> with a recent NUT?
> OK, tested on the Ubuntu system and it works just fine! My
> PW5110 has the same firmware versions as yours, and the Ubuntu
> system I tested on has kernel 3.2.0 on it and nut 2.6.3. I'll
> see if I can get kernel 3.2.0 on the RaspberryPi and report back.
> I've got kernel 3.2.0 on the RaspberryPi and nut 2.6.4 and the
> bcmxcp_usb driver reports the same problem :(
> damn, this would lead me to also think about a kernel or libusb issue.
> just to be sure, is bcmxcp_usb linked against libusb *0.1* and not
$ ldd bcmxcp_usb
libusb-0.1.so.4 => /lib/arm-linux-gnueabihf/libusb-0.1.so.4
libpthread.so.0 => /lib/arm-linux-gnueabihf/libpthread.so.0
libc.so.6 => /lib/arm-linux-gnueabihf/libc.so.6 (0x401bd000)
/lib/arm-linux-gnueabihf/ld-linux.so.3 => /lib/ld-linux-armhf.so.3
So yes, looks like it's linked to libusb 0.1.
> I'm going to go with the last option I have, and will replace this
> UPS with one that works with this combination of architecture and
> OS! :)
> yup, still an option ;)
Thanks for your help!
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Nut-upsuser