[Nut-upsuser] Cannot connect to a Eaton Ellipse Pulsar ASR/6000VA usbs [solved] but new problem surfaces.

Louis Chaillet louis.chaillet at gmail.com
Fri Jun 21 15:33:51 UTC 2013


Op 21 jun. 2013 05:02 schreef "Charles Lepple" <clepple at gmail.com> het
volgende:
>
> On Jun 20, 2013, at 10:35 AM, Louis Chaillet wrote:
>
>> With respect clarification of the documentation (and reference to your
question Charles). The documentation does suggest that you can shutdown the
ups by the upsdrvclt shutdown [ups] command. Specifically in "
http://www.networkupstools.org/docs/man/upsdrvctl.html" in the section
commands under warning. In the "Network UPS Tools User Manual" (pdf) under
section 6.3.2 in the last paragraph it is suggested to first test
the /usr/local/ups/bin/upsdrvctl -t shutdown and then "upsmon -c fsd". Also
this section suggests that under some circumstances you cannot rely on the
shutdown sequence to issue this command.
>
>
> Thanks, noted.
>
>> However the real reason I tried "upsdrctl -c shutdown" (not the test) is
that I  already tested the setup with the "upsmon -c fsd". The results is
that the server closes down, as expected, but ups does not shutdown, and so
there is no restart of the server.
>>
>> I was guessing it has to do with the particular shutdown command of the
server I have, which was "SHUTDOWNCMD "/usr/lib/web-admin/backend.pl
power_off"".
And I was trying to fix that by calling the upsdrvctl shutdown command
directly from a script.
>>
>> As I do not use the packaged (debian) shutdown script (/sbin/shutdown)
do I need to tell the ups to power down myself, as   suggested in  the
documentation (configuration notes, see reference above)?
>
>
> I haven't traced through the Debian shutdown sequence recently, but I
think that they call "upsdrvctl shutdown" after the rest of the system
processes have shut down (including the NUT driver). That should avoid the
"device or resource busy" error - only one process can open the UPS USB
device node at a time.
>

Thanks for all your help, regards Louis

> --
> Charles Lepple
>
> A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
> Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
> A: Top-posting.
> Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/nut-upsuser/attachments/20130621/81f73217/attachment.html>


More information about the Nut-upsuser mailing list