[Nut-upsuser] Configuring APC Smart-UPS 2200 on two computers

[Shade Alabsa]

Charles and Tim -
    I actually had 192.168.123.1 3493 initially since that's what I thought
was correct but it didn't work - don't remember the exact error and I'm not
near the hardware right now to check it. I don't believe I checked 0.0.0.0
3493. I will try both again when I get a chance and reply with a better
update. Thanks for the quick reply!

Shade


On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 8:30 PM, Tim Dawson <tadawson at tpcsvc.com> wrote:

> No "LISTEN" entry on 192.168.123.1 for anything other than 127.0.0.1 . .
> . So connection refused is the correct response under those conditions.
>
> - Tim
>
> On March 25, 2014 6:39:32 PM CDT, Shade Alabsa <shade34321 at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> I have a dual controller box similar to this -
>>
>> http://www.supermicro.com/products/system/3U/6037/SSG-6037B-DE2R16L.cfm
>>
>> On one controller I have Nut configured and working as a server. On the
>> other side I'm trying to configure Nut as a slave to query the other side
>> and for some reason it's not working. I'm getting this error:
>>     "Error: Connection failure: Connection refused"
>>
>> I'm running with the following set up
>> OS - CentOS 6.4
>> Nut - 2.6.5-2el6.x86_64
>> http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/epel/6/x86_64/repoview/nut.html
>> Nut client - nut-client-2.6.5-2.el6.x86_64
>> http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/epel/6/x86_64/repoview/nut-client.html
>> UPS - APC Smart-ups 2200
>>
>> I installed both nut packages via RPM's taken from the links above. I
>> have a pastebin link below with all the configurations. I only added in the
>> lines that weren't commented out. Also if there is only a config file
>> listed for 192.168.123.1 but not one listed for 192.168.123.3 it is because
>> 192.168.123.3 has the exact config file. I also do not have iptables or
>> selinux running. I also have this same exact set up running on Fedora 11
>> and nut package 2-4.1-12.fc11.x86_64 so I'm not sure what the difference
>> is.
>>
>> 192.168.123.1 is the master and is the controller directly connected to
>> the UPS
>> 192.168.123.3 is the slave and is the controller that I want to poll
>> 192.168.123.1 for information.
>>
>>
>> http://pastebin.com/dGgKEBDH
>>
>> I feel like it's a stupid configuration issue that I've missed so
>> hopefully somebody can point it out for me. Thanks!
>>
>> Shade
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> Nut-upsuser mailing list
>> Nut-upsuser at lists.alioth.debian.org
>> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsuser
>>
>>
>
> ---
> Tim Dawson
> Lewisville, TX
>
> "Gaff tape can't fix "Stupid", but it can muffle the sound . . ."
> Sent via Android
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/nut-upsuser/attachments/20140325/7e127dab/attachment.html>