[Nut-upsuser] Problems with NUT 2.7.2 on CentOS 7 and using the Mini-Box OpenUPS

[Philip Taylor]

Charles,

Thanks again for your help, and sorry I didn’t :cc - noted for the future!

I’m suspicious that the OpenUPS doesn’t behave properly in a number of ways, of which the USB traffic is the one of immediate concern. It seems to me that NUT can read from it but probably not write to it: and the OpenUPS doesn’t flag ‘low battery’ conditions correctly either. It does shut itself down at a battery voltage I can configure (via MS windows) and it does provide a signal via a cable to the power button that will trigger a linux shutdown - but it won’t do this via USB. So it’s useable with that work-round but not as intended!

It also reports spurious values - you spotted the 3.9 million seconds! When on input power, that’s what you get for runtime! A sensible value is passed when on battery. Whether that matters is questionable. Various other values aren’t good either, like battery current when running on battery. Again that’s not too important as battery voltage, output voltage and output current are OK.

Mini-box support and documentation are very poor too - but you can’t help with that!

I hope you can comment on the attached debug output which you requested. I’ve provided two - one on battery and the other on input power (which is 15v for my OpenUPS). (I have higher debug level options available but you asked for -DDD)

The command I used to start the driver was /usr/sbin/usbhid-ups -DDD -a openups

Finally, I’d be interested in the additional debug modes for usbhid-ups. This isn’t a ‘production system’ currently; it’s my home automation server and it’s getting rebuilt shortly as I’ve changed tack on a few things and it needs a clean out anyway! So I will try anything!

Many thanks for your help.

Philip.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: openups_drv_start_lineon.gz
Type: application/x-gzip
Size: 8755 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/nut-upsuser/attachments/20150314/f46ffa1e/attachment-0002.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: openups_drv_start_onbatt.gz
Type: application/x-gzip
Size: 8920 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/nut-upsuser/attachments/20150314/f46ffa1e/attachment-0003.bin>
-------------- next part --------------


> On 13 Mar 2015, at 23:17, Charles Lepple <clepple at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> On Mar 13, 2015, at 10:14 AM, Rob Groner <rgroner at RTD.com> wrote:
> 
>>> 
>>> The documentation isn't explicit about this, but 'upsdrvctl shutdown' is
>>> meant to be run after all of the other processes on the system have been
>>> killed, real filesystems have been unmounted, and the kernel shutdown
>>> syscall is about to be called. Usually the init scripts will take care of this,
>>> although I don't know how CentOS handles that specifically.
>>> 
>>> If you want to test the low-battery shutdown procedure (where upsmon
>>> tells the rest of the system to shut down, then tells the UPS to power off),
>>> you can run 'upsmon -c fsd' (Forced ShutDown). The init scripts should call
>>> 'upsdrvctl shutdown' implicitly when everything else has stopped.
>> 
>> I wish it were explicit.  :)
> 
> Since that comment didn't come with any documentation patches attached, I'm going to act like it never happened :)
> 
>> You say to use FSD for testing the system...what do I use for real?
> 
> Let's back up. I was recommending the use of 'upsmon -c fsd' for simulating the low battery condition that upsmon reacts to. That allows testing of the low battery shutdown process without actually draining the battery. It sounds like you are describing a shutdown triggered by a sysadmin, rather than upsmon.
> 
>> I thought I was supposed to call upsdrvctl shutdown with some delay, and THEN begin shutting down my PC, in the hopes I finish before the delay expires and the UPS shuts off of the power supply.
> 
> You could, although there is no delay parameter to 'upsdrvctl shutdown' So you are at the mercy of whether the shutdown process finishes in time.
>> 
>> When you say "the init scripts will take care of this", do you mean that if I execute a system shutdown, it will automatically send the "upsdrvctl shutdown" command at the end?
>> 
> 
> IMHO, yes, this is the job of the distribution's packager: lining up the scripts such that typing 'poweroff' will both shut down the UPS after a delay, and shut down the computer (or halt it and wait for the UPS to cut power, if the BIOS latches the power off state). If the distribution doesn't do that, then I'd call it a misconfiguration or a bug (since at that point, the packages are doing little more than helping the compilation stage). And with the proliferation of init systems, configuration will probably be distribution-specific from that point on.
> 
> See previous comments about not knowing what CentOS does. Debian (wheezy; not sure about jessie yet) and Ubuntu have a "poweroff" action in /etc/init.d/nut-client.
> 
> -- 
> Charles Lepple
> clepple at gmail
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Nut-upsuser mailing list
> Nut-upsuser at lists.alioth.debian.org
> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsuser