[Nut-upsuser] Help with Elite 800VA usb UPS
Andrea de Lutti
adelutti at gmail.com
Mon Jul 3 14:21:09 UTC 2017
Ok, I am running NUT in dummy mode.
I have added a new ups in ups.conf
[dummy]
driver = dummy-ups
port = upsc.dev
desc = "dummy ups for testing purposes"
upsc.dev has been generated by exporting the Elit configuration.
I have added the monitor line in upsmon.conf and the "exec" flags (all the
events)
MONITOR dummy at artu 1 user pass master
SHUTDOWNCMD "/sbin/shutdown -h +0"
NOTIFYCMD /usr/local/bin/upssched-script
NOTIFYFLAG ONLINE SYSLOG+WALL+EXEC
NOTIFYFLAG ONBATT SYSLOG+WALL+EXEC
NOTIFYFLAG LOWBATT SYSLOG+WALL+EXEC
NOTIFYFLAG FSD SYSLOG+WALL+EXEC
NOTIFYFLAG COMMOK SYSLOG+WALL+EXEC
NOTIFYFLAG COMMBAD SYSLOG+WALL+EXEC
NOTIFYFLAG SHUTDOWN SYSLOG+WALL+EXEC
NOTIFYFLAG REPLBATT SYSLOG+WALL+EXEC
NOTIFYFLAG NOCOMM SYSLOG+WALL+EXEC
NOTIFYFLAG NOPARENT SYSLOG+WALL+EXEC
The upssched-script is
#! /bin/sh
case "$1" in
"ONBATT")
echo "On batt" | mailx -v -r "adelutti at gmail.com" -s "TEST NUT
object" -S smtp="smtp.gmail.com:587" -S smtp-use-starttls -S
smtp-auth=login -S smtp-auth-user="adelutti at gmail.com" -S
smtp-auth-password="gtmtnqyelhlumyds" -S ssl-verify=ignore
adelutti+server at gmail.com
;;
"ONLINE")
echo "On power" | mailx -v -r "adelutti at gmail.com" -s "TEST NUT
object" -S smtp="smtp.gmail.com:587" -S smtp-use-starttls -S
smtp-auth=login -S smtp-auth-user="adelutti at gmail.com" -S
smtp-auth-password="gtmtnqyelhlumyds" -S ssl-verify=ignore
adelutti+server at gmail.com
;;
"LOWBATT")
echo "LOWBATT" | mailx -v -r "adelutti at gmail.com" -s "TEST NUT
object" -S smtp="smtp.gmail.com:587" -S smtp-use-starttls -S
smtp-auth=login -S smtp-auth-user="adelutti at gmail.com" -S
smtp-auth-password="gtmtnqyelhlumyds" -S ssl-verify=ignore
adelutti+server at gmail.com
;;
*)
logger -t upssched-cmd "Unrecognized command: $1"
;;
esac
while upssched.conf is
# Network UPS Tools - upssched.conf sample file
#
#
============================================================================
CMDSCRIPT /usr/local/bin/upssched-script
PIPEFN /var/run/nut/upssched/upssched.pipe
LOCKFN /var/run/nut/upssched/upssched.lock
AT ONBATT * EXECUTE onbattwarn
AT ONLINE * EXECUTE ups-back-on-power
Running upson in debug mode I can see the change of the status (I have a
cycle of 30 secs for online/batterry/low battery) but the syslog reports
Jul 3 16:17:15 artu upsmon[4685]: UPS dummy at artu on battery
Jul 3 16:17:15 artu upssched-cmd: Unrecognized command: UPS dummy at artu on
battery
Jul 3 16:17:45 artu upsmon[4685]: UPS dummy at artu battery is low
Jul 3 16:17:45 artu upssched-cmd: Unrecognized command: UPS dummy at artu
battery is low
Jul 3 16:18:15 artu upsmon[4685]: UPS dummy at artu on line power
Jul 3 16:18:15 artu upssched-cmd: Unrecognized command: UPS dummy at artu on
line power
Jul 3 16:18:45 artu upsmon[4685]: UPS dummy at artu on battery
Jul 3 16:18:45 artu upssched-cmd: Unrecognized command: UPS dummy at artu on
battery
Jul 3 16:18:57 artu systemd[1]: Started CUPS Scheduler.
Jul 3 16:19:15 artu upsmon[4685]: UPS dummy at artu battery is low
Jul 3 16:19:15 artu upssched-cmd: Unrecognized command: UPS dummy at artu
battery is low
I have tried so many commands, but always the same result...
PS: this evening I will change the battery, I have some standby/cycle
voltage declared by the manufacturer: should I use them?
Thank you,
Regards
Andrea
2017-06-29 14:59 GMT+02:00 Andrea de Lutti <adelutti at gmail.com>:
>
>> Bear in mind that upsmon runs as user "nut" on Ubuntu, as does the
>> NOTIFYCMD script. At one point, you said that the script is in /root, which
>> is not commonly readable by other users. Does the script work if you move
>> it to, say, /usr/local/bin?
>>
>> (With Ubuntu 16.04, there should be some error messages from upsmon in
>> 'journalctl' referencing permissions.)
>>
>> I have tried running from /etc/nut, now moved in /usr/local...will keep
> you informed
>
>
>
>> Under the Bugs heading, the man page says "Instant commands are not yet
>> supported in Dummy Mode..." - one of the use cases was automated developer
>> testing of NUT, and there isn't much use in simulating all of the commands
>> in that case. "load.off" is probably worth implementing at some point for
>> user testing.
>>
>> So for your use case, the timers would probably be the easiest way with
>> the current code.
>
>
> Ok, I am testing it, thank you
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/nut-upsuser/attachments/20170703/65f79274/attachment.html>
More information about the Nut-upsuser
mailing list