[Nut-upsuser] Device not supported?
ambrojohn at gmail.com
Wed Jul 5 21:19:55 UTC 2017
I've eventually installed Manuel's packages (nut and nut-client).
When I run the driver as root (for my tripplite ups) I get:
Network UPS Tools - Generic HID driver 0.42 (v2.7.4-418-gb1314c22.214.171.124)
USB communication driver (libusb 0.1) 0.33
writepid: fopen /var/run/nut/usbhid-ups-trippliteups.pid: Permission denied
Can't claim USB device [09ae:1330]: could not detach kernel driver from
interface 0: Operation not permitted
Driver failed to start (exit status=1)
And I had to create manually /var/run/nut.
What is the problem there?
On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 8:27 PM Manuel Wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro>
> On 06/24/2017 04:52 AM, Charles Lepple wrote:
> > On Jun 23, 2017, at 5:50 PM, Ambrogio Coletti <ambrojohn at gmail.com>
> >> "This TrippLite device (09ae:1330) is not (or perhaps not yet)
> supported by usbhid-ups. [...]"
> >> but my device (SU2200RTXLCD2U) is supported, as clearly state here.
> > No, the HCL also mentions "protocol 4001". For Tripp-Lite, a USB PID
> other than 0001 is generally the protocol number. So your SU2200* model is
> > https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/issues/64
> >> Then I thought I needed the last src code (2.7.4), hence I built it for
> my machine, but when I run it by:
> >> /usr/local/ups/sbin/upsdrvctl start
> > The Protocol 1330 support was added after 2.7.4 was released. You might
> be able to use a 2.7.4 tarball with "productid = 1330" in ups.conf, but
> voltages might be off by a factor of 10. You will also need to adjust the
> udev files manually to fix /dev/bus/usb permissions.
> > If you do choose to build using the latest source code from Git, be
> aware that you will need more tools, as specified in the Developer Guide:
> > It may be easier to use the 2.7.4 tarball, and add the patch which
> introduces Protocol 1330 support to the RPM spec file:
> I've uploaded to http://wolfy.fedorapeople.org/nut a new set of packages
> based on the latest source code from git. Unfortunately they do not
> include any man pages, I did not have time to find a workaround for the
> hard requirement of newer versions for the tools used by the build
> process to create the man pages. I will fix that in a later set of
> Nut-upsuser mailing list
> Nut-upsuser at lists.alioth.debian.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Nut-upsuser