[Nut-upsuser] Bug or feature? polling frequency = (pollfreq + pollinterval)
René Berber
rberber at fastmail.fm
Tue Sep 19 17:36:44 UTC 2017
Hi,
Context of my question:
* OS name and version,
Synology's distributed Linux: Linux DS 3.10.102 #15152 SMP Fri Sep 1
11:15:03 CST 2017 x86_64 GNU/Linux
* exact NUT version,
Tricky... the installed tools display:
$ /usr/sbin/upsd -V
Network UPS Tools upsd DSM6-1-15114-170518
while the one I've compiled, and its not running, displays:
$ /opt/sbin/upsd -V
Network UPS Tools upsd 2.7.4
My guess is that they are the same version (Synology keeps it updated).
Also...
driver.version: DSM6-1-15114-170518
driver.version.data: MGE HID 1.33
* NUT installation method:
Comes with Synology's DSM, and its updated by them.
* UPS device name and related information
Eaton 5PX 1500
* Problem description
Not a problem, just an observation.
I made a program to monitor my UPS, the final objective is to implement
a power use totalizer, and wanted to see which polling frequency is the
minimum required.
Read about pollfreq, and pollinterval, but didn't see NUT's code.
The values of those are:
driver.parameter.pollfreq: 30
driver.parameter.pollinterval: 5
I found that power consumption (ups.realpower) only changes every 35
seconds, which is (pollfreq + pollinterval).
Does this looks correct? I would expect changes at pollfreq.
Thanks.
--
René Berber
More information about the Nut-upsuser
mailing list