[Nut-upsuser] [networkupstools/nut] RFC: clarify and complete battery dates (#1063)

[Arnaud Quette]

Le lun. 9 août 2021 à 15:06, Roger Price <roger at rogerprice.org> a écrit :

> On Mon, 9 Aug 2021, Arnaud Quette wrote:
>
> > small update (replay of #1062): these were announced to the mailing list
> as an RFC for a week, without feedback so far:
> >
> https://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/nut-upsuser/2021-August/012485.html
> >
> > Is a "no answer / objection" considered as a rough consensus? If so, is
> there some time limit attached?
>
> If nobody has objected after a week, then I suggest
>
>   1) Go ahead with the proposed additions
>   2) Give us a link to the new docs/nut-names.txt
>
> One of the big advantages of having NUT project management of the
> Recording
> Document, is that any typos or omissions can be fixed without impacting
> the
> I-D/RFC.
>

Hi Roger,

thanks for your answer!

I may be misreading your answer, or misunderstanding the new process, so
please bear with me.
on 1) though I still have the power to merge PRs, I don't consider that I'm
the right person now to merge these:
* PR https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/pull/1060/files
* PR https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/pull/1062/files
* PR https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/pull/1063/files

@Charles Lepple <clepple at gmail.com> and @Jim Klimov
<jimklimov+nut at gmail.com> esp. your feedback is welcome

on 2) the resulting new docs/nut-names.txt will the the one in git master
branch, once the above PRs are merged.

If agreed, I can proceed with merging these PRs, and link back the
docs/nut-names.txt in the git master branch.

thanks and cheers,
Arno
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/nut-upsuser/attachments/20210811/d9f300bd/attachment.htm>