[Nut-upsuser] RFC - new proposed variables and clarifications for the battery collection in NUT namespace

[Roger Price]

On Thu, 12 Aug 2021, Arnaud Quette via Nut-upsuser wrote:
> following a 10 days period after my above announcement, I've considered the 
> absence of feedback and comments as an implicit approval. I've hence merged 
> the above PRs, which results in the update of the NUT variables names and 
> instant commands update:

> https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/blob/6d30b8cd190b25cafdbc46f8dc4602fb68692270/docs/nut-names.txt

I'm wondering if it wouldn't be helpful in the long term if the process you have 
inaugurated were written into the file nut-names.txt  Something like:

Adding names to this file
=========================

If you want to add (change or remove) names in this file, then remember that it 
is part of RFC XXXX, and that your action requires the "rough consensus" due to 
an RFC.  In practice this means large approval in the NUT mailing list.  Post 
your intended change and invite comments.  If, after 10 days you have received 
no objections, then you may assume that you have large approval.  Make a second 
announcement in the NUT mailing list that you now intend to make the change.

Roger