[Nut-upsuser] [EXTERNAL] Proposed RFC - independent reviewers wanted
roger at rogerprice.org
Tue Jul 27 19:36:13 BST 2021
On Tue, 27 Jul 2021, David Zomaya wrote:
>>> The reviewer is someone with a general understanding of computer systems and
>>> maybe of power supplies as well, who asks:
> That all seems doable.
> Are multiple reviewers needed or just 1?
> There are likely more brains at Tripp Lite that could add value here and they could either review separately or I could collaborate with them.
Hello David, The ISE editor uses the word "reviewers" in the plural.
> How soon does review need to be completed and how is review feedback provided?
The IETF ISE (Independent Submissions Editor) describes what is needed:
: The document has been through a round of editing as I discussed several
: points with the authors, and now I'm looking for a few brief reviews.
: Are you able to have a look at it, and tell me (briefly) what you think of
: it, please?
: - Would publication be a good/bad idea?
: - Is it clear enough to be published and implemented?
: If you are also willing and have the time/energy, would you be prepared to
: do a more detailed review as well, with two parts:
: a) Comments for the Authors
: Reasons for rejection or suggestions for improvements.
: These will be returned to authors (or you may wish to have
: email discussions directly with authors). These may be
: be published in an 'ISE write-up' if this draft
: is sent to the IESG for a Conflict Review (RFC 5742).
: b) Comments for the Independent Submissions Editor
: These are advice to the ISE, and will not be published.
: If you can do the review, two to three weeks would be a good time frame.
If you are interested I will forward your name to the ISE. Roger
More information about the Nut-upsuser