[Nut-upsuser] [EXTERNAL] Proposed RFC - independent reviewers wanted

Roger Price roger at rogerprice.org
Tue Jul 27 19:36:13 BST 2021

On Tue, 27 Jul 2021, David Zomaya wrote:

>>> The reviewer is someone with a general understanding of computer systems and
>>> maybe of power supplies as well, who asks:
> That all seems doable.
> Are multiple reviewers needed or just 1?
> There are likely more brains at Tripp Lite that could add value here and they could either review separately or I could collaborate with them.

Hello David, The ISE editor uses the word "reviewers" in the plural.

> How soon does review need to be completed and how is review feedback provided?

The IETF ISE (Independent Submissions Editor) describes what is needed:

: The document has been through a round of editing as I discussed several
: points with the authors, and now I'm looking for a few brief reviews.

: Are you able to have a look at it, and tell me (briefly) what you think of
: it, please?

: - Would publication be a good/bad idea?
: - Is it clear enough to be published and implemented?

: If you are also willing and have the time/energy, would you be prepared to
: do a more detailed review as well, with two parts:

: a) Comments for the Authors
:    Reasons for rejection or suggestions for improvements.
:    These will be returned to authors (or you may wish to have
:    email discussions directly with authors).  These may be
:    be published in an 'ISE write-up' if this draft
:    is sent to the IESG for a Conflict Review (RFC 5742).

: b) Comments for the Independent Submissions Editor
:    These are advice to the ISE, and will not be published.

: If you can do the review, two to three weeks would be a good time frame.

If you are interested I will forward your name to the ISE.   Roger

More information about the Nut-upsuser mailing list