[Nut-upsuser] UPS not Shutting Down

[chribonn at duck.com]

Thank Charles. I've bookmarked this and will try to experiment a bit.

On Mon, 3 Jun 2024, 04:33 Charles Lepple via Nut-upsuser, <
nut-upsuser_at_alioth-lists.debian.net_chribonn at duck.com> wrote:

> On Jun 2, 2024, at 12:14 PM, Roger Price wrote:
> >
> >> Is the comment about offdelay (in red) correct / can this line be
> eliminated?.
> >
> > My understanding is "yes", but others may have deeper knowledge.
>
> I don't have a ton of direct experience with this post-v2.7.4, but someone
> else wrote this up for overriding battery.charge.low:
> https://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/nut-upsuser/2023-November/013481.html
>
> (There are a few other override/ignorelb write-ups in the list archives,
> too. Unfortunately, DDG is not finding them and I just snagged the first
> hit on Google.)
>
> The key is that any override.* variables without "ignorelb" are just
> telling white lies to any clients connected to upsd, without any
> corresponding change in behavior in the driver or UPS. With "ignorelb", you
> are telling the driver to ignore the UPS-calculated LB signal, and
> synthesize it using the override.* parameters.
>
> So I would either:
>
> 1) use offdelay and don't use override.battery.runtime.low
> 2) use ignorelb and remove offdelay
>
> I am skeptical that a Phoenixtec-based UPS has fully configurable shutdown
> thresholds, but that is probably based on very old information, and I would
> love to be proven wrong..
> _______________________________________________
> Nut-upsuser mailing list
> Nut-upsuser at alioth-lists.debian.net
> https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsuser
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/nut-upsuser/attachments/20240603/9303e874/attachment.htm>