jgoerzen at complete.org
Mon Oct 4 22:48:25 BST 2010
On 10/04/2010 10:04 AM, Johannes Stezenbach wrote:
> Hi John,
> I looked through the mailing list archive and git history
> but didn't find an answer to the question:
> Q: Why is it
> X-OfflineIMAP-random-stuff: more random stuff
> instead of
> X-OfflineIMAP: random-stuff + more random stuff
It made it easier to search for the one particular header desired.
There could be multiple X-OfflineIMAP headers added if a message is
moved beween folders more than once. Then multiple headers would be
returned and it would have to find the particular one it's interested
in. Not a big deal, just a hassle.
> One of the mail servers I have to use is Exchange
> (Microsoft Exchange Server 2003 IMAP4rev1 server version 6.5.7638.1),
> and I'm concerned about the issue which used to be described in
> BTW, where did the issue tracker go?
there's on on github.com/jgoerzen/offlineimap now.
I'm not sure if that issue is still a problem with more modern Exchanges.
> Would you accept a patch to change the X-OfflineIMAP header format
> or was there an issue with some IMAP servers which required
> the current X-OfflineIMAP header format?
If I hadn't retired from maintaining OfflineIMAP, yes, of course. Right
now nobody has as yet stepped up to maintain patchsets/branches/etc...
maybe you are that person.... <hint hint>
> However, in the -d imap debug log I found that the APPEND command returns
> the new UID value, so the X-OfflineIMAP header isn't actually used
> (UID SEARCH is never executed), thus I can't really test it...
APPEND is not guaranteed to do so, if memory serves.
More information about the OfflineIMAP-project