[PATCH] imaplib2: Bump from 2.20 to 2.22
Sebastian at SSpaeth.de
Mon Apr 11 18:36:00 BST 2011
On Mon, 11 Apr 2011 12:53:47 -0400, Ethan Glasser-Camp wrote:
> anything that should break. But I don't really understand why we need
> to connect() twice; is this to work around strange intermittent network
> failures? It only goes a second time if it gets interrupted by a
> signal. This isn't related to the starttls stuff, right?
That is my only objection to imaplib2: the code is horribly
underdocumented. I guess he had a reason to make that connect more
robust, but don't ask me for which reasons :-).
It can't hurt in any case.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the OfflineIMAP-project