[PATCH 0/13] Re: Reintegrate imaplib2 and IDLE, again
Sebastian at SSpaeth.de
Mon Feb 7 12:43:55 GMT 2011
On Sun, 6 Feb 2011 22:15:00 +0100, Nicolas Sebrecht <nicolas.s-dev at laposte.net> wrote:
> I'll do merge as soon as I'll have the missing Signed-off-by(s). In
> order to have it more widely tested, we could merge it in the mainline
> _IF_ IDLE option is marked as EXPERIMENTAL stuff (after the coming
> stable release, of course).
I agree that this should go into some mainline branch soon. But I would
propose to merge the APPENDUID branch and release that one as a proper
release first. It fixes the mangling of emails in many cases and the
handing of the wrong date to the mail server in nearly all cases.
If we release that and integrate the IDLE branch than, it will be easier
to find out which branch is responsible for breaking things and it would
be easier to revert the IDLE branch if it were responsible for breaking
I am pro-merging it, but I am not sure it can be added as an optional
experimental feature, as IMAPLIB2 interfaces with our regular code is
quite some places as the patches show.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the OfflineIMAP-project