[PATCH 0/13] Re: Reintegrate imaplib2 and IDLE, again
glasse at cs.rpi.edu
Tue Feb 8 08:17:14 GMT 2011
On 02/07/2011 05:19 PM, Nicolas Sebrecht wrote:
>> Are you talking about the APPENDUID feature, or the
>> conversion from imaplib to imaplib2 (or maybe both)? When you say
>> that something should be optional, does that mean it should be
> When I say it should be optional, I want to say it should be an option
> in the sense that users have the possibility to either use it or not.
> This usually means that it is user-configurable but not only. It may
> depends of data (in the case of a new configuration format file, for
I don't think converting from imaplib to imaplib2 is the sort of change
we can make configurable without adding a significant amount of code
complexity. Is this something you would like me to add? I think it is
more likely to break things than the simple switch-over that I have now.
More information about the OfflineIMAP-project