[PATCH 0/13] Re: Reintegrate imaplib2 and IDLE, again
Sebastian at SSpaeth.de
Tue Feb 8 08:48:43 GMT 2011
On Tue, 08 Feb 2011 03:17:14 -0500, Ethan Glasser-Camp <glasse at cs.rpi.edu> wrote:
> I don't think converting from imaplib to imaplib2 is the sort of change
> we can make configurable without adding a significant amount of code
> complexity. Is this something you would like me to add? I think it is
> more likely to break things than the simple switch-over that I have now.
I agree that trying to make imaplib2 optional is more likely to break
things than simply offering a development version with imaplib2
enabled. It simply interfaces with too many areas in the code.
This way people could test it on some accounts and we get time
to iron out any kinks we see. That's why I would love to see APENDUID
going in first and have a "proper" release with that.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the OfflineIMAP-project