getting rid of X-Offlineimap header

Dan Christensen jdc at
Sat Jan 22 02:10:09 GMT 2011

Sebastian Spaeth <sebastian at> writes:

> So, what we could do, is checking the imapobj.capabilities for "UIDPLUS"
> and if it contains that, we don't fudge headers but rely on the
> APPENDUID response.

Yes, please!  I brought this up in December too

and pointed out that the header is added even in cases where offlineimap
knows the UID.

My mail client finds it confusing that messages disappear and reappear
with a new UID.

> Am I missing something obvious here? Do we need that header for a
> different purpose too?

I don't think it is used for anything else.


More information about the OfflineIMAP-project mailing list