Sebastian at SSpaeth.de
Fri Jun 24 12:34:08 BST 2011
OK, glad it fixes things. The previous way of doing things is highly
fragile and definitely broke things and this patch fixes it and makes it
more robust, so I agree that we should be including it in the next
release (patch was against next).
After that has gone in, I recommend to do a very quick -rc cycle before
releasing the next stable. We have 2 critical bug fixes in the
unreleased code already.
On Fri, 24 Jun 2011 12:03:08 +0200, Vincent Beffara <vbeffara at ens-lyon.fr> wrote:
> SS> In any case the MappedIMAP use needs a lot more love and if there
> SS> are champions for it, I wouldn't mind. Did I mention already that I
> SS> am NOT using it myself? :-)
> Well, I seem to be the only one using it apparently. Hmm ... I think I
> see your point ...
Nah, a whole bunch of people is using it. Mostly syncing from Gmail I
suspect ;-). They are all just scared by the code :).
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the OfflineIMAP-project