[PATCH 00/13] imaplib2/IDLE again

Ethan Glasser-Camp glasse at cs.rpi.edu
Wed Mar 9 09:04:33 GMT 2011

Oops! Sorry for the duplicate email, Sebastian.

On 03/09/2011 02:59 AM, Sebastian Spaeth wrote:
> We could merge patches 1-5, which as far as I can see would be the drop
> in replacement of imaplib with imaplib2.

Yeah, that would be OK. I would also merge 11 and 12, which are niceties 
that improve robustness.

> Personally, I still think we should spin a 6.3.3 before merging this, so
> that we get all the goodness we have so far into the distros, but I
> don't feel very strongly about it.

I agree; imaplib->imaplib2 is a huge transition and should be handled 


More information about the OfflineIMAP-project mailing list