'Safe Harbor' version of offlineimap

Robert Marianski rob at marianski.com
Thu Jun 14 02:47:56 BST 2012

On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 12:22:15PM +0530, Sriram Karra wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 10:05 PM, Konrad Hinsen
> <konrad.hinsen at fastmail.net>wrote:
> > Daniel P. Wright writes:
> >
> >  > Sorry to dig up an old thread -- I was just wondering if you got
> >  > anywhere with this?
> >
> > Not really. I ended up doing what you envisage as well: go back
> > to an older version of offlineimap.
> While there are undeniably some serious stability issues with offlineimap
> in recent times, it is quite a valuable tool for many; I am loathe to
> abandon offlineimap because of any transitory quality issues.
> I wonder if we can ascertain the 'last best version' which appears to work
> for most loyal users, where most of us can park ourselves while Sebastien
> and others can figure out the quality issues.
> I use 6.5.1, largely works with occasional hangs I have to fix with a kill
> -9, but I have not lost any mail so far. So I'd say that's a "make do".
> What version of offlineimap have you been most happy with?
> -Karra

I haven't updated since I don't have any problems, and am happy
with it.


More information about the OfflineIMAP-project mailing list