Server responded: ('NO', ['[ALREADYEXISTS] Duplicate folder name?(Failure)'])
gammel.holte at gmail.com
Wed May 2 12:08:16 BST 2012
Ok, I now found the issue, my nametrans was fine but:
"every nametrans setting on a remote repository requires an equivalent
nametrans rule on the local repository that reverses the
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 11:38 AM, Thomas Kahle <tomka at gentoo.org> wrote:
> On 08:55 Wed 02 May 2012, Alex Søndergaard wrote:
>> > I seem to have sorted this out, so no need for anyone to waste time
>> > replying. Apologies for the noise.
>> how did you sort out this issue?
>> I've just upgraded from 6.5.3 to 126.96.36.199 and I'm encountering the same issue. It
>> seems to be related to nametrans, but my configuration hasn't changed...
> Triplecheck your nametrans rules (I mean: play around with the functions
> in a python shell!). It seems like some not entirely correct functions
> where accepted before:
> (from Changelog)
> -) Fixed some cases where invalid nametrans rules were not caught and we
> would not propagate local folders to the remote repository. (now tested
> in test03)
> Thomas Kahle
More information about the OfflineIMAP-project