Server responded: ('NO', ['[ALREADYEXISTS] Duplicate folder name?(Failure)'])
tomka at gentoo.org
Wed May 2 12:37:17 BST 2012
On 13:08 Wed 02 May 2012, Alexander Søndergaard wrote:
> Ok, I now found the issue, my nametrans was fine but:
> "every nametrans setting on a remote repository requires an equivalent
> nametrans rule on the local repository that reverses the
Good! But this was introduced long before the 6.5 series...
> On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 11:38 AM, Thomas Kahle <tomka at gentoo.org> wrote:
> > On 08:55 Wed 02 May 2012, Alex Søndergaard wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >> > I seem to have sorted this out, so no need for anyone to waste time
> >> > replying. Apologies for the noise.
> >> how did you sort out this issue?
> >> I've just upgraded from 6.5.3 to 18.104.22.168 and I'm encountering the same issue. It
> >> seems to be related to nametrans, but my configuration hasn't changed...
> > Triplecheck your nametrans rules (I mean: play around with the functions
> > in a python shell!). It seems like some not entirely correct functions
> > where accepted before:
> > (from Changelog)
> > -) Fixed some cases where invalid nametrans rules were not caught and we
> > would not propagate local folders to the remote repository. (now tested
> > in test03)
> > Cheers,
> > Thomas
> > --
> > Thomas Kahle
> > http://dev.gentoo.org/~tomka/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 316 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
More information about the OfflineIMAP-project