<DKIM> Re: <DKIM> unified inbox in local repo
nicolas.s-dev at laposte.net
Wed Jul 25 20:53:51 BST 2018
On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 08:48:37AM +0000, J. Tull wrote:
> ok, so this is one more reason to strenghten the base on which the sync
> process runs. offlineimap should be inspired from rsync. It offers many
> parameters that can be used as base for syncing process.
> I tried to look into the sources of offlineimap to add parameters such
> as message-ID, Subject, dates, etc to add optionally as base for
> syncing but i need some guidance to know which files should i look into
> in priority.
I understand your POV. However, all of the historical/regular
contributors to offlineimap and I know that the offlineimap code base is
Please read these blog posts:
offlineimap won't be updated to support Py3. We've tried. We've failed.
More than once.
offlineimap will die with the coming death of py2.
Do you think this worth the efforts? I don't think so. I want to focus
on imapfw ASAP (likely something like mid/end of 2019).
More information about the OfflineIMAP-project