[parted-devel] The -s/-i options

Anant Narayanan anant at kix.in
Sat Dec 2 15:33:37 CET 2006


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi All,

I don't think i understand the -s and -i options completely. While the
- -s options ensures that no user-intervention is required, -i makes sure
that questions are asked where necessary.

Aren't these options unnecessarily redundant? We can easily make one of
the behaviors to be the default one (preferably the asking questions
option). If a script wants to use parted, it simply uses the -s option.
I don't think there's any need for the -i option at all.

Is this ok or am I missing something? I've removed the -i option on my
local repository and if nobody objects I'll push it to master.

Cheers,
Anant
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD4DBQFFcY7BTon3xA72kU4RAt4pAKC23kIeDKdaHVaBqdKeEpluuyujmwCYn6sY
ern+wezXOWlH7FUfP1T4KA==
=G2Fl
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



More information about the parted-devel mailing list