[parted-devel] Re: [Parted-edge] Use of ped_exception...

[leslie.polzer at gmx.net]

On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 02:04:56AM +0530, Debarshi 'Rishi' Ray wrote:

> I have observed that the ped_exception functions are still not used
> uniformly throughout the code. eg., do_mklabel (lines 586-589) in
> parted/parted.c use them, while it is missing in do_mkfs (lines
> 626-627) in the same file.
>
> I discussed this with Otavio on IRC, and although he favoured the
> ped_exception way of doing things, he wanted to ask for others'
> opinions.
>
> So, what do you think?
I think I'm exceptionally late in answering this question :)
Please excuse the delay.

  I'm not sure what you mean.  Both times a function is called, which in
turn throws an exception if required.

  Leslie

-- 
gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys DD4EBF83
http://nic-nac-project.de/~skypher/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/parted-devel/attachments/20061211/04307732/attachment.pgp