[parted-devel] Re: Parted 2.0 plans

[Otavio Salvador]

"Debarshi 'Rishi' Ray" <debarshi.ray at gmail.com> writes:

>> Hello David,
>>
>>    as promised some information on the plans for GNU Parted 2.0.
>>
>> [SNIP]
>>
>> PARTED:
>> -------
>>
>> Task #1 (bundle):
>> =================
>> * parted -l (direct interface to "print all" command)
>
> I have implemented this feature. However I found '-a' and '--all' to
> be a more reasonable choice than '-l'. However if you disagree, then
> you can always change it.

I think -l is more clear. It'll basically "list" the devices. But
another options would be put one as an alias to the other. Would work
fine.

Basically, I still think -l is clear.

> +static int print_all ();

Why you didn't use _print_all ();?

-- 
        O T A V I O    S A L V A D O R
---------------------------------------------
 E-mail: otavio at debian.org      UIN: 5906116
 GNU/Linux User: 239058     GPG ID: 49A5F855
 Home Page: http://otavio.ossystems.com.br
---------------------------------------------
"Microsoft gives you Windows ... Linux gives
 you the whole house."