[parted-devel] Re: Parted 2.0 plans

[Debarshi 'Rishi' Ray]

>>> Task #1 (bundle):
>>> =================
>>> * parted -l (direct interface to "print all" command)
>>
>> I have implemented this feature. However I found '-a' and '--all' to
>> be a more reasonable choice than '-l'. However if you disagree, then
>> you can always change it.

> I think -l is more clear. It'll basically "list" the devices. But
> another options would be put one as an alias to the other. Would work
> fine.
>
> Basically, I still think -l is clear.

Okay.

> > +static int print_all ();
>
> Why you didn't use _print_all ();?

There are 2 functions. print_all does the actual job of 'print all'.
When invoked using the command line switch _print_all calls print_all
and exits, in other cases do_print calls print_all. I chose the names
according to the way 'version' and '--version' are implemented through
'do_print' and '_version' respectively.

Has it messed up the naming conventions?

Happy hacking,
Debarshi

-- 
I only work when I am not doing any assignments.