[parted-devel] policy regarding unused functions?
Jim Meyering
jim at meyering.net
Thu Feb 15 17:48:32 CET 2007
Otavio Salvador <otavio at debian.org> wrote:
> Jim Meyering <jim at meyering.net> writes:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'm preparing a patch that makes the build warning free,
>> and found some unused functions in libparted/labels/fdasd.c.
>> Here they are:
>>
>> (fdasd_partition_type):
>> (fdasd_write_vtoc_labels):
>> (fdasd_change_volser):
>> (fdasd_check_volser):
>> (fdasd_reread_partition_table):
>
> On this specific case I think that would be better to leave fdasd out
> of your patch. We have a fix on Debian package that needs to be ported
> (from 1.7 release) and then dasd could be cleaned up.
I'm easy.
But you say "fdasd", then "dasd". I presume the latter should be "fdasd".
However, are you worried about the risk of a merge conflict?
Unless it's more than a strategic fix, they shouldn't be changing dead code
More information about the parted-devel
mailing list