[parted-devel] help2man
David Cantrell
dcantrell at redhat.com
Mon Jan 15 19:27:50 CET 2007
Anant Narayanan wrote:
>> Instead of removing it we could make it optional. That would give us
>> the best of both worlds ;-)
>
> Perfect :)
>
> David; I think making po4a optional instead of removing it looks like
> the best way to go.
OK, how about a ./configure option to enable documentation? That will
cause po4a to be invoked (and also checked for).
--
David Cantrell
Red Hat / Westford, MA
More information about the parted-devel
mailing list