[parted-devel] help2man

David Cantrell dcantrell at redhat.com
Mon Jan 15 19:27:50 CET 2007


Anant Narayanan wrote:
>> Instead of removing it we could make it optional. That would give us
>> the best of both worlds ;-)
> 
> Perfect :)
> 
> David; I think making po4a optional instead of removing it looks like
> the best way to go.

OK, how about a ./configure option to enable documentation?  That will 
cause po4a to be invoked (and also checked for).

-- 
David Cantrell
Red Hat / Westford, MA



More information about the parted-devel mailing list