[parted-devel] help2man

[Otavio Salvador]

David Cantrell <dcantrell at redhat.com> writes:

> Anant Narayanan wrote:
>>> Instead of removing it we could make it optional. That would give us
>>> the best of both worlds ;-)
>>
>> Perfect :)
>>
>> David; I think making po4a optional instead of removing it looks like
>> the best way to go.
>
> OK, how about a ./configure option to enable documentation?  That will
> cause po4a to be invoked (and also checked for).

Ack.

-- 
        O T A V I O    S A L V A D O R
---------------------------------------------
 E-mail: otavio at debian.org      UIN: 5906116
 GNU/Linux User: 239058     GPG ID: 49A5F855
 Home Page: http://otavio.ossystems.com.br
---------------------------------------------
"Microsoft sells you Windows ... Linux gives
 you the whole house."