[Piuparts-devel] Bug#632046: Bug#632046: Bug#632046: Bug#632046: piuparts: Use HTTP_PROXY

[Scott Schaefer]

On 07/05/2011 05:49 AM, Holger Levsen wrote:
> Hi Scott,
>
> On Montag, 4. Juli 2011, Scott Schaefer wrote:
>    
>>> awesome than you already are, you could include debian/changelog entries
>>> in your patches too :-)
>>>        
>> Um ... OK.  I will have to learn how to do that.  I will add to my
>> "Learn About ..." list :-)
>>      
> sudo apt-get install devscripts
> man dch
> dch
>
> :-)
>    

Ah ... That will get us into long discussion about host of topics 
concerning development workflows, packaging/release workflows, patch 
approvals, testing, policies, reposibilities, etc., etc.  For now, I 
would like to continue to rely on you to update the changelog.

>
>    
>>> it also seems to contain unwanted noise about force-confdef :/
>>>        
>> I didn't see that in my (limited) testing.  I will re-test (after mod
>> described below) and look specifically for anything about confdef.  In
>> meantime, do you recall precisely what it reports ?
>>      
> You misunderstood me: it's in the patch you posted, not in the output of the
> code running...
>    

Hm ......

This is against svn r907 ...

$ svn log|head
------------------------------------------------------------------------
r907 | holger | 2011-06-27 03:17:41 -0400 (Mon, 27 Jun 2011) | 1 line

piuparts-report.py: correct a typo from the patch for #523950.
------------------------------------------------------------------------


And piuparts.py:

$ cksum piuparts.py
1279739423 86368 piuparts.py

Applies with fuzz, since patch is against version with 
"dpkg_divert.patch" already applied
$ patch -p1 < .hg/patches/apt_proxy.patch
patching file piuparts.py
Hunk #1 succeeded at 677 (offset -5 lines).


Applies cleanly with "dpkg_divert.patch" popped

$ hg qpop
popping apt_proxy.patch
$ patch -p1 < .hg/patches/apt_proxy.patch
patching file piuparts.py

I have run result with both HTTP_PROXY set and unset, with both 
--dpkg-force-confdef and without.

I will test against the piuparts.conf I have from piatti for 
master/slave testing.

Or perhaps I'll just get the revision for apt-config coded, and test the 
revised one :-)

>
>    
>> I already found 'apt-config' (which addresses all three of my
>> "issues").  I have it on my list to execute it and pull any
>> Acquire::Proxy value from there if HTTP_PROXY is not in os.environ.  So
>> I'll send revised patch in next 3-4 days.
>>      
> Cool!
>
>
> cheers,
> 	Holger
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Piuparts-devel mailing list
> Piuparts-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org
> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/piuparts-devel
>