[Piuparts-devel] broken-symlinks, next step

[Dave Steele]

On Saturday, July 13, 2013, Holger Levsen wrote:

> Hi Dave,
>
> On Sonntag, 7. Juli 2013, Dave Steele wrote:
> > I'd recommend that the next step is a filing against the couple-dozen
> > broken-symlink packages with more than, say, 50 reverse dependencies,
>
> Sounds good to me.


This month is busy. It may take a bit.


> > After that, I'd say the issue is ready for elevation, in terms of work
> > on the piuparts side.
>
> what do you mean by this? Make broken symlink an error condition for
> piuparts?


That would be my recommendation - along with a strategy of replacing
lower-level mass bug filings with better DDPO/PTS integration.


-- 
"Le mieux est l'ennemi du bien" - Voltaire
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/piuparts-devel/attachments/20130717/f375d14a/attachment.html>