[Piuparts-devel] broken-symlinks, next step

[Holger Levsen]

Hi Dave,

On Sonntag, 7. Juli 2013, Dave Steele wrote:
> I'd recommend that the next step is a filing against the couple-dozen
> broken-symlink packages with more than, say, 50 reverse dependencies,
> at normal severity. Resolving those bugs would reduce the potential
> dependency-failed-testing count due to broken-symlink failures by
> 3000+
> 
> Agree?

Sounds good to me. 

_Maybe_ (for some?) "important" could also be choosen (with the usual 
justification that a piuparts clean archive has been a release goal since 
lenny), given there is (rough) consensus for this on debian-devel at l.d.o.

> After that, I'd say the issue is ready for elevation, in terms of work
> on the piuparts side. 

what do you mean by this? Make broken symlink an error condition for piuparts?


cheers,
	Holger
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 828 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/piuparts-devel/attachments/20130713/43c9a263/attachment.sig>