[Piuparts-devel] Bug#705977: Bug#705977: Bug#705977: lib/db: sort packages returned by reserve() by importance

Andreas Beckmann anbe at debian.org
Mon Jun 17 11:32:49 UTC 2013


On 2013-06-15 23:19, Holger Levsen wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Samstag, 15. Juni 2013, Dave Steele wrote:
>> Ping - branches submitted 3 months ago.
> 
> I just quickly reviewed dave/faster-rdep-calc and found it ok. Andreas, any 
> severe concerns?
> 
> c7a92d7 packagesdb - Refactor out get_rdep_dict() from calc_rrdep_counts().
> f22a107 packagesdb.py - Use get_package() in get_rdep_dict() to resolve 
> virtual pkgs.
> 4940555 packagesdb - Add routine to calc rdep metrics by package as needed.
> 92b4e81 packagesdb - Add rdep metric accessors at the PackagesDB level.
> fa063fa Use the on-demand versions of the rdep metric calls.
> c41d3fd packagesdb.py - Remove the Package-level interface for rdep metrics.
> 5e36786 piuparts-report.py - Avoid sorting passed files by block count.
> 0d08b12 Changelog entry for rdep metric rework.

IIRC there is an updated branch of this in my repository, called somehow
dave-rebase/..... (can't look it up right now)

but there are some issues with this approach, especially I'd like to get
rid of all the exceptions and index with package names ...

but I hvae no time this week ...

Andreas

from ISC'13/Leipzig



More information about the Piuparts-devel mailing list