[Piuparts-devel] RFC: Ideas around pkg-perl-autopkgtest

[Axel Beckert]

Hi,

Paul Wise wrote:
> > (2) there might be a better place to run adequate for all packages
> > in the archive than ci/autopkgtest".
[...]
> (2) is solved already, piuparts.d.o already runs adequate apparently.
> Not sure if/where it exports the results though.

Ah, thanks for that reminder. I vaguely remember piuparts-specific
bug-reports against adequate.

So the adequate tests for autopkgtest seem indeed obsolete.

But then again, adequate warnings don't count as "fail" in piuparts.
Look for "but adequate" on e.g. https://piuparts.debian.org/sid/

And on the per-maintainer or per-package view, they don't seem to
appear yet: E.g.
https://piuparts.debian.org/sid/bin_or_sbin_binary_requires_usr_lib_library_inadequate_issue.html
lists cifs-utils, but neither
https://piuparts.debian.org/sid/source/c/cifs-utils.html says anything
about this issue nor does
https://piuparts.debian.org/sid/maintainer/p/pkg-samba-maint@lists.alioth.debian.org.html

So the situation there is definitely suboptimal. Cc'ing the Piuparts
Developers for further input on this.

		Regards, Axel
-- 
 ,''`.  |  Axel Beckert <abe at debian.org>, http://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' :  |  Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin
`. `'   |  1024D: F067 EA27 26B9 C3FC 1486  202E C09E 1D89 9593 0EDE
  `-    |  4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329  6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5