[Piuparts-devel] RFC: Ideas around pkg-perl-autopkgtest

[Holger Levsen]

Hi Axel,

On Freitag, 29. August 2014, Axel Beckert wrote:
> But then again, adequate warnings don't count as "fail" in piuparts.
> Look for "but adequate" on e.g. https://piuparts.debian.org/sid/

thats currently correct, as all the severe issues adequate detects are also 
detected by piuparts anyway...
 
> And on the per-maintainer or per-package view, they don't seem to
> appear yet: E.g.
> https://piuparts.debian.org/sid/bin_or_sbin_binary_requires_usr_lib_library
> _inadequate_issue.html lists cifs-utils, but neither
> https://piuparts.debian.org/sid/source/c/cifs-utils.html says anything
> about this issue nor does
> https://piuparts.debian.org/sid/maintainer/p/pkg-samba-maint@lists.alioth.d
> ebian.org.html
> 
> So the situation there is definitely suboptimal. Cc'ing the Piuparts
> Developers for further input on this.

do you think that bin_or_sbin_binary_requires_usr_lib_library should cause a 
piuparts test failure? IOW: does it at least warrant important bugs, maybe 
even serious ones?


cheers,
	Holger
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 828 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/piuparts-devel/attachments/20140829/536ade2c/attachment.sig>