[Piuparts-devel] jessie-rcmd ?

[Holger Levsen]

Hi,

On Freitag, 23. Januar 2015, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> I think for a selected set of tests "stable" and "testing" can be useful

I like to generate data for "named" distros, so that we'll have 
wheezy+jessie+stretch graphs in future and not stable+testing graphs with 
different "meaning" over time...

> >>       p.conf: add [testing-rcmd] (with --install-recommends)
> > 
> > NACK on this.
> 
> Right now we have wheezy2jessie-rcmd tests.
> What benefit would we get from an additional wheezy-rcmd test? 

I never wanted wheezy-rcmd, I wanted jessie-rcmd (=testing-rcmd...)

> I expect we will add
> jessie2stretch and jessie2stretch-rcmd quite early which would make
> jessie-rcmd not that much useful either.

why do you think jessie-rcmd is not useful when we have jessie2stretch-rcmd ?
 
> But if you prefer, I can turn it into jessie-rcmd.

yes, please.

> >>       piuparts_issue: transient apt-cache failures
> >>       piuparts_issue: remove empty logfiles
> these two I had removed because of a quoting error, fixed version was
> included in recent batch

did I pick the right ones?
 
> > 2e37e88 detect_archive_issues: move archive_issues.txt to master/
> That's a statefile and therefore is better located in master/ than in
> htdocs/, also we should have a backup of it since it contains historic
> information.

hm, ok. I assume it wasn't linked anywhere?


cheers,
	Holger
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 828 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/piuparts-devel/attachments/20150123/bc93b40b/attachment.sig>