[Piuparts-devel] more bits for buster

[Holger Levsen]

On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 01:10:44PM +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> > while I quite a lot dislike to rename suites in piuparts, because that
> > adds confusion on top of the existing confusion. IMO we should rather
> > try to get the suites renamed 'upstream'
> this is not a visible change on piuparts.d.o

where is it visible then? or does it just affect your piuparts
instance???

> there is no upstream equivalent of buster-next

? I dont understand, there is buster-proposed?!

> > also you can either grep for "buster-proposed/" or "buster-proposed\ "
> > instead of "buster-proposed", or?
> Nope. Probably "buster-proposed(?!-)", which might be in the pcre domain.
> I want to make my life easier, not harder.

ok, understood.

> and here are two more:
> 
> 5d33d1fa4 p.conf: [sid-merged-usr] ignore disappearing /usr/lib{32,x32}/
> 9d9203948 pre_remove_40_find_unowned_lib_links: ignore some more links

thanks, merged and deploying.

I'm pondering to upload this as piuparts 1.0, what do you think? Or
maybe rather 0.99? ;)


-- 
tschau,
	Holger

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
               holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org
       PGP fingerprint: B8BF 5413 7B09 D35C F026 FE9D 091A B856 069A AA1C
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/piuparts-devel/attachments/20190501/1d7cea52/attachment.sig>