[Piuparts-devel] Piuparts regression blocks migration to "testing"

[Dmitry Smirnov]

On Saturday, 18 January 2020 2:37:29 AM AEDT Nicolas Dandrimont wrote:
> [I've just started looking after piuparts.d.o a few days ago, and it's
> taking me a while to get up to speed; sorry for the inconvenience in the
> mean time!]

No worries, thanks. :)


> In general, piuparts failures are retried automatically; empirically,
> currently, the delay before retries in sid is around two weeks.

Thanks for this crucial information. It might be great to mention that
in the wiki:

 https://wiki.debian.org/piuparts/FAQ#Q._Can_I_somehow_tell_piuparts_to_retest_my_package.3F

Currently wiki says "eventually".


> In the specific case of these false-positives, the packages have been
> fast-tracked and should have been retested by now.

It took a while but all the affected packages were successfully re-tested.

Thank you.

-- 
All the best,
 Dmitry Smirnov.

---

It is a mistake to try to look too far ahead. The chain of destiny can only
be grasped one link at a time.
        -- Winston Churchill
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/piuparts-devel/attachments/20200118/f797ed35/attachment.sig>