Bug#1092912: quickjs: somewhat dead upstream, switch to quickjs-ng ?

[Jérémy Lal]

Le jeu. 16 janv. 2025 à 19:20, Sebastian Humenda <shumenda at gmx.de> a écrit :

> Hi
>
> I recall that upstream of Edbrowse wasn't so intrested in switching to
> quickjs-ng. For me, it's mostly a matter of actually trying edbrowse with
> quickjs-ng, as quickjs was packed *because of* edbrowse. I do lack the time
> ATM, so if you'd be willing to take a look whether this works, I'd
> appreciate


I've pushed a Draft PR to edbrowse.

I propose to maintain quickjs. I'm going to use it with nginx's njs.
It makes sense to me to change its team maintenance to
pkg-javascript-devel, or even simply to debian group.

Jérémy
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/pkg-a11y-devel/attachments/20250117/b3b73b41/attachment.htm>